Ayn Rand Institute scholars argue that contributing money to political campaigns and causes is a speech act that deserves protection.

Roger Pilon, from the Cato Institute, argues that campaign contributions should be considered acts of free speech. Link to other Cato documents.

Mary Meehan, a DC-based journalist, argues in this Cato Policy Analysis that the Federal Election Commission is a huge roadblock to democracy.

Cato scholars argue that the prospect of Congress imposing strict campaign-finance rules is worse than the existing, laissez faire politics.

Libertarian think tank argues that regulating campaign finance will have a number of unintended, negative consequences for voters.

Claremont Institute policy brief argues that the current efforts at campaign-finance reform are actually attempts to thwart liberty.

Claremont Institute scholar Edward Erler argues in "Money Talks" that the only workable system of campaign finance is unlimited contributions.

Find news and updates on this conservative think tank's efforts to forestall further campaign-finance regulations and eliminate current laws.

Center for the Study of the American Electorate analyzes the risk of an unfair advantage for incumbents in races with strict spending caps.